Are You a Self-Manager

Are You a Self-Manager?

To determine your self-management initiative, rate each of the following items, from 1 (“Never Do This”) to 7 (“Always Do This”).

    Never Do This Always Do This
Planning  
1. I plan out my day before beginning to work. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
2. I try to schedule my work in advance. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
3. I plan my career carefully. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
4. I come to work early to plan my day. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
5. I use lists and agendas to structure my workday. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
6. I set specific job goals on a regular basis. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
7. I set daily goals for myself. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8. I try to manage my time. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Access management  
1. I control the access subordinates have to me in order to get my work done. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
2. I use a special place at work where I can work uninterrupted. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
3. I hold my telephone calls when I need to get things done. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Catch-up activities  
1. I come in early or stay late at work to prevent distractions from interfering with my work. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
2. I take my work home with me to make sure it gets done. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
3. I come in on my days off to catch up on my work. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Emotions management  
1. I have learned to manage my aggressiveness with my subordinates. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
2. My facial expression and conversational tone are important in dealing with subordinates. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
3. It’s important for me to maintain a “professional” manager-subordinate relationship. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
4. I try to keep my emotions under control. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

 

Scoring Key:

Higher scores mean a higher degree of self-management. For the overall scale, scores of 100 or higher represent high scores. For each area, the following represent high scores: planning, scores of 48 or higher; access management, scores of 18 or higher; catch-up activities, score of 18 or higher; and emotions management, scores of 24 or higher.

Source: M. Castaneda, T.A. Kolenko, and R.J. Aldag, “Self-Management Perceptions and Practices: A Structual Equations Analysis”, Journal of Organizational Behaviour 20, 1999. Table 4, pp. 114-115. Copyright © John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Reproduced with permission.