FINAL Draft of a Rhetorical Analysis
Refer to the “First Draft of a Rhetorical Analysis” document for instructions on completing this assignment. This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with expectations for successful completion. Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. **RUBRIC IS ATTACHED** ENG-105 Topic 3 Rubric: Rhetorical Analysis (ONL) Criteria % Value 1: Unsatisfactory 2: Insufficient 3: Approaching 4: Acceptable 5: Target % Scaling 0% 65% 75% 85% 100% Content– 60% Analysis of the appeals and the rhetorical situation 40% The analysis reflects no attention to the expectations of the genre and intended audience and no understanding of rhetorical analysis techniques including identifying and analyzing an audience, purpose, and the effective use of the rhetorical tools’ ethos, pathos, logos. Explanations do not reflect critical thinking. The analysis reflects some attention to the expectations of the genre and intended audience and minimal understanding of rhetorical analysis techniques including identifying and analyzing an audience, purpose, and the effective use of the rhetorical tools’ ethos, pathos, logos. Explanations reflect minimal critical thinking. The analysis reflects some attention to the expectations of the genre and intended audience and some understanding of rhetorical analysis techniques including identifying and analyzing an audience, purpose, and the effective use of the rhetorical tools’ ethos, pathos, logos. Explanations reflect some critical thinking. The analysis reflects good attention to the expectations of the genre and intended audience and a good understanding of rhetorical analysis techniques including identifying and analyzing an audience, purpose, and the effective use of the rhetorical tools’ ethos, pathos, logos. Explanations reflect good critical thinking. The analysis reflects outstanding attention to the expectations of the genre and intended audience and a thorough understanding of rhetorical analysis techniques including identifying and analyzing an audience, purpose, and the effective use of the rhetorical tools’ ethos, pathos, logos. Explanations of ideas reflect excellent critical thinking. Use of evidence as support 20% Minimal or no evidence the subject or research is included in the essay. Evidence requirements were not met. Evidence from the subject or research is often not integrated effectively may be missing or may not justify ideas. Few evidence requirements were met. Evidence from the subject or research is not always integrated effectively and does not always justify ideas. Some evidence requirements were met. Evidence from the subject or research is usually integrated and supports and justifies ideas. Most evidence requirements were met. Evidence from the subject or research is integrated effectively for the genre of a rhetorical analysis, justifies ideas, and enriches the essay. All evidence requirements were met. Organization, Effectiveness, and Format – 40% Organization 10% The essay lacks clear and consistent organization of ideas throughout the essay. The organization of the essay hinders the presentation of the content. Errors in organization are pervasive, including errors regarding the introduction and thesis, topic sentences, or a conclusion. The organization of the essay may hinder Read More …
